Previous Page  32 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

S

upporting

Y

our

P

ractice

32

|

Volume 2 Issue 2

BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE

How Hidden Biases May Lead to

Investment Errors

Ron Haik

MBA, CFP, FMA,

FCSI, CIWM,TEP

Vice-President,

Investment Advisory

Services,

CDSPI Advisory

Services Inc.

Since the advent of stock markets, analysts have used a variety of metrics

to examine—and try to explain—market behaviour. These have included

influences such as interest rates, inflation, oil prices, economic activity, as well

as the fundamentals of individual companies that lead to investment decisions.

Theoretically, if all people have essentially the same information at the same

time, markets should be efficient. That is to say that the share price of a company

should reflect its actual value (based primarily on an estimation of its potential

future earnings), and buyers and sellers should trade within a narrow range of

that value.

But that’s not what actually happens. Other factors are at play, including

excessive optimism driving prices unduly high at times, or excessive pessimism

that drives them unduly low. This has led to some of the dramatic bubbles and

crashes that have occurred throughout the history of the market.

About 40 years ago, as economists tried to figure out why investors often

made irrational choices that were contrary to their best interests, some

groundbreaking thinkers brought a new analytical tool to the mix: behavioural

finance. Behavioural finance gained traction in 2002 when psychologist Daniel

Kahneman won a Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his work in the field.

Theorists suggested a number of cognitive biases that consistently impact

investment decisions. Some of these include:

• Loss Aversion

The negative emotion of losing money outweighs the positive emotion

of making it. Studies have shown the pain of loss is twice that of the joy of

making money out of an investment, so people may avoid taking a loss and

hang on to an investment when indicators suggest they shouldn’t.

• Anchoring

People fixate on a price point at which they bought a stock, or a price the

stock had achieved at some prior time, even if circumstances have changed.

Some investors, for example, expect a stock that was a star to regain its

brilliance long after it has faded and is unlikely to rebound.

• Herding

Investors, including some large institutional investors, tend to follow what the

other guy is doing.