Previous Page  22 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

22

|

Volume 2 Issue 2

N

ews and

E

vents

The Bridgework

to a Better Practice

87610

9781118275023

April 2015 | $136.99

9781118340332

December 2014 | $197.99

9781118688878

April 2015 | $237.00

Visit

wiley.ca/go/dentistry

to browse our complete library of dentistry

journals, books, and more. Available in print and e-book formats.

Rise in incidence of infective

endocarditis follows drop in

antibiotic use

Using national data on hospital episode statistics,

which capture records for admitted patients,

outpatients, accidents and emergencies, researchers

identified close to 20,000 patients with a primary

diagnosis of IE over about 13 years (8 years before

the guidelines and 5 years afterwards). After the

NICE guidelines were implemented, the incidence of

IE—which had been trending upward—significantly

increased. At the end of the study, researchers

estimated there were almost 35 more cases of IE per

month than would have been expected given historical

trends. Both high-risk and lower-risk individuals were

affected by this increase.

Caution against drawing strong

conclusions

In response to the study,

The Lancet

also published a

commentary

5

that noted the study’s limitations and

cautioned against drawing strong conclusions—similar

to points made by the study authors themselves. “The

follow-up comment noted other potential and plausible

reasons for the increase in incidence of IE, such as an

ageing population and an increased prevalence of

people with intracardiac devices,” says Dr. Quiñonez.

“In addition, one of the limitations of using hospital

discharge data is that it is unknown whether new cases

of IE were the result of oral streptococcal bacteria.”

The study authors call for further research to assess

whether similar trends can be found in other

populations. In light of these findings, NICE announced

an immediate review of its 2008 guideline.

a

References

1.DayerMJ,JonesS,PrendergastB,BaddourLM,LockhartPB,ThornhillMH. Incidenceof infective

endocarditis inEngland,2000–13:aseculartrend, interruptedtime-seriesanalysis.2014;

The

Lancet.EarlyOnlinePublication

;18Nov2014,doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62007-9.

2.National Institute forHealthandClinicalExcellence.Prophylaxisagainst infectiveendocarditis:

antimicrobialprophylaxisagainst infectiveendocarditis inadultsandchildrenundergoing

interventionalprocedures.

NICEClinicalGuidelineNo64.

London:National Institute forHealthand

ClinicalExcellence,2008.

3.CanadianDentalAssociation.CDApositiononpreventionof infectiveendocarditis[accessed2

Dec2014].Available

:http://www.cda-adc.ca/_files/position_statements/infectiousEndocarditis.pdf

4.AmericanHeartAssociation.Preventionof infectiveendocarditis:guidelines fromtheAmerican

HeartAssociation:aguideline fromtheAmericanHeartAssociationRheumaticFever,Endocarditis,

andKawasakiDiseaseCommittee,CouncilonCardiovascularDisease intheYoung,andtheCouncil

onClinicalCardiology,CouncilonCardiovascularSurgeryandAnesthesia,andtheQualityofCare

andOutcomesResearch InterdisciplinaryWorkingGroup.Circulation.2007;116(15):1736-54.Epub

2007Apr19.

5.DuvalX,HoenB.Prophylaxis for infectiveendocarditis: let’sendthedebate.

TheLancet

.18Nov

2014,doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62121-8.