Current Issue | Subscriptions | |||||||
Back Issues | Advertising | |||||||
More Information | Classified Ads | |||||||
For Authors | Continuing Education | |||||||
|
||||||||
How Predictable Are Periodontal Regenerative Procedures?FULL TEXT
• Ron Zohar, DMD, PhD, FRCD(C) • A b s t r a c tAlthough clinical measurements of attachment level and probing depths, along with radiography, are good methods of evaluating tooth survival and prognosis, they do not indicate true biological regeneration. In addition, the regeneration industry may encourage the overuse of allografts and alloplasts which may serve as an impediment to simple wound healing. This review is a critical assessment of the clinical use of various regenerative tools, specifically bone replacements and membranes. The future of the regeneration industry may depend on the merging of various technologies and biological concepts, including the possible use of biological barriers, various bone and periodontal growth inducers, and artificial matrices that will attract or carry the cells necessary for regeneration.
MeSH Key Words: alveolar bone loss/surgery; bone regeneration; guided tissue regeneration, periodontal; membranes, artificial
Reply to this article | View replies [0]
|
|
Full text provided in PDF format |
|
Mission Statement & Editor's Message |
Multimedia Centre |
Readership Survey Contact the Editor | Français |